Puerto Vallarta Revenue Law Amended

Please Rate Vote 1 Vote 2 Vote 3 Vote 4 Vote 5

Amendments to the Revenue Act of Puerto Vallarta for the financial year 2013 polarized Members of different political parties represented in the local Congress.

Lawmakers left the Legislature last approved in committees and presented at first reading revenue laws of all municipalities, but the current deputies found it necessary to make adjustments in the proposal that they inherited the former deputies.

In the proposal to the municipality's income from Puerto Vallarta established an increase of 14% and to 38% in property taxes, lawmakers unanimously endorsed that generally stay with increases of 14%.

Deputies PRI, the PAN, and Jaime Alberto Iñiguez Esquer and Citizens Movement bloc quitting endorsed changes in increments of 14%, the rest of the PAN legislators and three PRI; Rafael Gonzalez Pimienta, Gustavo Gonzalez and Martin Lopez Cedillo were on the original proposal.
He endorsed changes in collection of overtime to turns with liquor. With 32 votes in favor, was that the additional charge for extra hour would be 500 thousand pesos in grocery stores, the convenience store will be charged two thousand 500 pesos per extra hour just like the restaurants, the clubs must pay four thousand 144 pesos per hour extra.

At the stroke of 19:00 was voted by the full state legislature to amend Article 96 of the Revenue Act charges they called "moral crimes for", are of the highest fines in the Revenue Act.

Charges will range from one million to two million 500 thousand pesos for display of child pornography in the municipality.

The vote was similar to the farm; PRI deputies, two of the PAN and the Citizens Movement bloc endorsed changes, the rest of the PAN legislators and three PRI; Rafael Gonzalez Pimienta, Gustavo Gonzalez and Martin Lopez Cedillo; against .

It was also voted the rest of the revenue laws, which according to the president of the Committee of Finance, minor modifications were implemented that have more to do with the form and not the substance of the original proposals.

[readon1 url="http://www.vallartatoday.com"]Source:vallartatoday.com - Translation by Suyapa Ajuria[/readon1]